Category Hub
Make.com
Visual automation that connects 1,500+ apps without code.
Make.com scenarios you can clone: lead enrichment, content repurposing, AI-powered inbox triage, and reporting on autopilot.
Make.com is the tool we pick when someone wants automation without hosting anything themselves. The visual builder is more forgiving than Zapier for anything that branches, loops, or waits — and the pricing usually works out better once you scale past a few hundred runs a day.
This hub is a library of real scenarios: lead enrichment, content repurposing, AI-powered inbox triage, reporting on autopilot, and the small AI wrappers around Gmail, Notion, Airtable, and Sheets that pay for themselves in the first week.
If you're weighing Make against n8n, read the head-to-head. Short version: Make if you want managed and clean, n8n if you want self-hosted and cheap at scale.
Tools & apps in this category
We're publishing reviews here this week. In the meantime, browse the full App Directory.
Frequently asked about Make.com
›Make.com vs Zapier — which should I pick?
For simple, linear workflows Zapier is fine. Once you need branching, loops, error handling, or heavy AI steps, Make is usually cheaper and easier to reason about. We use Make for anything non-trivial.
›Make.com vs n8n — which is better?
Make if you want zero-ops and clean visuals; n8n if you want self-hosting, custom code nodes, and lower cost at high volume. Both are excellent; the decision is about ops appetite, not features.
›How much does Make cost to run useful automations?
The free tier is enough to test. Real business use lands most people on the Pro plan. Cost is driven by operations per run — batch and filter early, don't move data you'll throw away.
›Can I use AI models inside Make?
Yes — native modules for OpenAI, Anthropic, and others, plus HTTP for anything else. Most of our published scenarios use at least one AI step.